Page 7 of 12

Re: Danoftardis's collection

Posted: Mon Jul 01, 2019 12:01 pm
by Danoftardis
SJF wrote:
Mon Jul 01, 2019 9:44 am
Those are his fighting tights. God Dan learn about fashion. :roll:
Fashion... Hmm... Nope I've never heard of 'fashion' before, sorry. :lol:

Re: Danoftardis's collection

Posted: Mon Jul 01, 2019 1:42 pm
by Deborah J
Speaking from experience, if you want to wear a dress but your legs look horrible then tights are just a gift from the gods. This roman friend understands this and now looks fabulous.

Re: Danoftardis's collection

Posted: Mon Jul 01, 2019 3:28 pm
by Danoftardis
I'll be totally honest, the last thing I expected from the post was for my roman dude's fashion sense to be a topic. :lol: If anyone likes his tights and wants to copy the look he got them from Marcus & Spencerus for 20 denarii.

Re: Danoftardis's collection

Posted: Mon Jul 01, 2019 4:26 pm
by Deborah J
Danoftardis wrote:
Mon Jul 01, 2019 3:28 pm
I'll be totally honest, the last thing I expected from the post was for my roman dude's fashion sense to be a topic. :lol: If anyone likes his tights and wants to copy the look he got them from Marcus & Spencerus for 20 denarii.
werent marcus and spencerus the slave traders in carry on cleo?

Re: Danoftardis's collection

Posted: Mon Jul 01, 2019 4:32 pm
by DalekCheese
Is the non-figure the drastic puppet? And *all* trendy romanz (‘coz dat is how da yoof spellz it innit) should have tights...

Re: Danoftardis's collection

Posted: Mon Jul 01, 2019 4:59 pm
by Danoftardis
Deborah J wrote:
Mon Jul 01, 2019 4:26 pm
Danoftardis wrote:
Mon Jul 01, 2019 3:28 pm
I'll be totally honest, the last thing I expected from the post was for my roman dude's fashion sense to be a topic. :lol: If anyone likes his tights and wants to copy the look he got them from Marcus & Spencerus for 20 denarii.
werent marcus and spencerus the slave traders in carry on cleo?
I have no idea, that's another film I've not seen. In fact I've not seen any of the carry on films. :o
DalekCheese wrote:
Mon Jul 01, 2019 4:32 pm
Is the non-figure the drastic puppet? And *all* trendy romanz (‘coz dat is how da yoof spellz it innit) should have tights...
The non-figure is a super sceret which will be revealed at the proper time. 8-)

Re: Danoftardis's collection

Posted: Mon Jul 01, 2019 6:22 pm
by DalekCheese
You haven’t seen any of the carry ons? Kill him.

Re: Danoftardis's collection

Posted: Mon Jul 01, 2019 8:14 pm
by Danoftardis
DalekCheese wrote:
Mon Jul 01, 2019 6:22 pm
You haven’t seen any of the carry ons? Kill him.
I mean I'd rather not have to die because of that, I may moan a lot about it, but I'm rather attached to life really.

Re: Danoftardis's collection

Posted: Tue Jul 02, 2019 9:27 am
by Deborah J
I mean they're not compulsory viewing, some of them haven't aged well, and the last few were dreadful, but there's some good stuff in there, particularly the 60s ones that are in colour, worth trying some time, maybe. Kenneth Williams is bae for life.

Re: Danoftardis's collection

Posted: Tue Jul 02, 2019 11:36 am
by Danoftardis
Deborah J wrote:
Tue Jul 02, 2019 9:27 am
I mean they're not compulsory viewing, some of them haven't aged well, and the last few were dreadful, but there's some good stuff in there, particularly the 60s ones that are in colour, worth trying some time, maybe. Kenneth Williams is bae for life.
I've seen the original St. Trinian's films from the 50's/60's, and found them suitably enjoyable. I don't know if that gives any indication of if I'd like/dislike the carry on films though. I can't think of anything else similar that I've seen.